CBN has powers to grant loans, allow repayment via securitisation, court rules

Date:

Must Read

Kwankwaso joins ADC as opposition coalition gains strength ahead of 2027 election

Nigeria’s opposition politics has entered a new phase as...

This is your final year in office — ADC send advance notice to Tinubu

The African Democratic Congress (ADC) has used President Bola...

Kwankwaso resign from NNPP as 2027 political race takes shape

Former presidential candidate of the New Nigeria Peoples Party...

ADC gains ground as Kwankwaso set to join on Monday

The Kwankwasiyya Movement has confirmed that former Kano State...

The Federal High Court sitting in Abuja has dismissed a lawsuit filed by Justus Edim against the President of Nigeria, Attorney General of the Federation, Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), and Debt Management Office.

The lawsuit challenged the securitization of loans granted to the Federal Government of Nigeria (FGN) under the Ways & Means program.

Justice Omotosho, who presided over the case, upheld the argument made by Mr. Kofo Abdusalam Alada, the CBN Director of Legal Services. Alada stated that the CBN has the power to grant the loans and allow repayment through securitization, as per the provisions of Section 38 of the CBN Act.

The court also noted that the CBN was the sole investor in the securitization process, ensuring that no inflation would be caused by the securitization. Additionally, the plaintiffs failed to provide credible evidence demonstrating any breaches by the CBN and the Debt Management Office regarding the securitization.

Earlier in the proceedings, the court had ruled that the plaintiffs, who claimed to be acting on behalf of 220 million Nigerians, lacked the legal standing (locus standi) to file the lawsuit. The plaintiffs failed to show that they had obtained a mandate from the people they claimed to represent or demonstrate that they had stronger interests than any other average Nigerian in the securitization of the Ways & Means loans.

The court expressed its disapproval of the practice of individuals, described as “busybodies,” rushing to court to waste its time with such cases. No costs were awarded to either party.

spot_imgspot_imgspot_img

Latest News

logo-nn-news-small
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.