FG charge man to court over Fashola written presidential judgement in favor of Tinubu

Date:

Must Read

2027: I’m not contesting, says El-Rufai as he welcomes thousands of PDP defectors to ADC

Former Kaduna State Governor, Nasir El-Rufai, has stated that...

2027: APC Lagos beg Jonathan not to run ask Nigeria to reject him

The Lagos State chapter of the All Progressives Congress...

Senator Marafa dumps APC, declares Tinubu a ‘use-and-dump’ leader 

Former Zamfara Central Senator Kabiru Garba Marafa, who played...

PDP considering Jonathan, Obi for 2027 presidential ticket – Bauchi Governor

Bauchi State Governor and chairman of the PDP Governors’...

2027: I will contest ADC presidential primary, won’t step down for anyone – Amaechi

Former Rivers State Governor and African Democratic Congress (ADC)...

Chike Ibezim faced legal battle as the Federal Government arraigned him for purportedly defaming former Minister of Works and Housing, Babatunde Fashola.

Alongside two others, Ibezim stands accused of spreading falsehoods suggesting Fashola’s involvement in shaping the judgment of the presidential election petition court in favor of Bola Tinubu, the All Progressives Congress (APC) candidate, amidst petitions by the Labour Party and the Peoples Democratic Party.

In a session held on Monday at the Federal High Court in Abuja, Ibezim faced a six-count charge for disseminating these allegedly baseless claims against Fashola on social media platforms. Among these charges, count one pointedly accused Ibezim of engaging in criminal conspiracy, specifically by jointly orchestrating the publication of defamatory statements against Babatunde Raji Fashola SAN, CON, through the online platform reportera.ng, without any substantiated grounds. This action, as per the charge, is punishable under Section 27(1)(b) of the Cyber-crime Prohibition, Prevention Act 2015.

Presiding over the proceedings, Judge Bolaji Olajuwon deferred further deliberations to April 15, scheduling a continuation of the trial.

In response to the allegations, Fashola vehemently refuted any involvement, denouncing the accusations as both unfounded and libelous. He went on to label those responsible for the claims as “instigators of unrest,” firmly distancing himself from the controversy.

The legal battle surrounding these allegations underscores the gravity of spreading unverified information, especially when it pertains to public figures, emphasizing the importance of accountability in social media discourse.

spot_imgspot_imgspot_img

Latest News

logo-nn-news-small
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.