The Human Rights Writers Association of Nigeria (HURIWA) condemns the leadership of outgoing Chief Justice Olukayode Ariwoola, labeled his tenure as one of the most disappointing in the judiciary’s history, citing issues such as nepotism, alleged corruption, and a disregard for justice.
HURIWA also expresses skepticism about Justice Kudirat Motonmori Kekere-Ekun’s appointment, referencing her controversial judgment in the 2019 Imo State gubernatorial case.
Key Concerns Raised by HURIWA
Nepotism Allegations: HURIWA highlighted instances of nepotism during Ariwoola’s leadership, notably the appointment of his brother, Adebayo Lateef Ariwoola, as head of the audit department at the National Judicial Council (NJC). This situation raises significant concerns about conflicts of interest and the integrity of the NJC’s operations.
Judicial Appointments: The association condemned Ariwoola’s involvement in securing a judicial position for his son, Olukayode Ariwoola Jr., as a Federal High Court Judge. This move, perceived as an abuse of power, has led to widespread public outcry and exemplifies the entrenched culture of nepotism.
Precedent for Future Leaders: HURIWA warned that Ariwoola’s actions have set a dangerous precedent, encouraging similar nepotistic behaviors among other judicial leaders, such as the Chief Judge of Abuja, who appointed his daughter to the bench.
Doubts Over New CJN Kekere-Ekun
As Justice Kudirat Motonmori Kekere-Ekun steps in as the new Acting CJN, HURIWA expresses skepticism about her leadership. They cite her controversial judgment in the 2019 Imo State gubernatorial case, where a fourth-place candidate was declared the winner, as a significant factor in the judiciary’s decline.
Integrity Concerns: HURIWA raised unresolved allegations against Kekere-Ekun regarding her failure to declare assets, questioning her integrity and the accountability of the judiciary.
Political Backing: The association fears that Kekere-Ekun’s appointment reflects significant political support, particularly from President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, which may compromise her independence and hinder necessary reforms.
Implications for Nigeria’s Judiciary
HURIWA’s assessment suggests a grim outlook for the Nigerian judiciary, arguing that the transition from Ariwoola to Kekere-Ekun does not indicate a positive change. They assert that without an independent and transparent judiciary committed to the rule of law, Nigeria’s democracy is at risk, and justice remains elusive for ordinary citizens.
In conclusion, HURIWA emphasizes the need for a judiciary that embodies fairness and integrity, but acknowledges that under the current leadership, this goal appears far from realization.
