Buba Galadima, a key figure in the New Nigeria People’s Party (NNPP), has shared his perspective on the recent decisions of the Supreme Court, particularly in the heated governorship tussle in Kano State.
Galadima expressed relief, emphasizing that the nation narrowly avoided significant unrest due to the Supreme Court’s rulings, especially regarding Governor Abba Yusuf of Kano State.
In a notable gesture, Galadima extended his congratulations to President Bola Tinubu of the All-Progressives Congress (APC) for his commitment to upholding the judiciary’s independence.
He acknowledged the potential complications, especially as the matter involved Nasir Gawuna, a member of the APC. Speaking on Channels TV, Galadima stated, “I am congratulating Mr. President for not interfering with the judiciary because Nigeria could have been on fire by now if what happened on Friday did not happen.”
He went on to commend Tinubu for his strength of character, highlighting the positive impact on the nation’s overall peace and international standing. Galadima emphasized the crucial role of the judiciary in maintaining stability and the reputation of the country.
The recent judgments by the apex court overturned decisions in eight governorship disputes, with three cases—Kano, Zamfara, and Plateau—standing out. The Supreme Court’s rulings reinstated governors in these states, challenging the earlier decisions of lower courts.
Before the judgment on the Kano governorship dispute, tension and anxiety were palpable in the state. Galadima revealed that there was a perceived plan to forcibly take power from the NNPP in Kano, especially since the party had ousted the APC in the previous election. He alleged, “There was a plan to take Kano by force from every level,” while commending the Supreme Court for “restoring the honour and dignity of the judiciary.”
Galadima concluded by stating that had the Supreme Court ruled differently, the consequences would have been severe, leading to public unrest and a loss of confidence in the judiciary. He emphasized the importance of the court’s role in providing a platform for seeking redress without fear of reprisal.
