A bill proposing the removal of “personal” in the application of Sharia law in Nigeria’s constitution has been rejected by the House of Representatives.
The proposed amendment sought to alter sections 24, 262, and 277 of the Constitution, aiming to expand Sharia’s application beyond personal matters like marriage and inheritance.
The bill’s sponsor, Aliyu Missau, argued that commercial entities such as Jaiz and Taj banks face operational challenges under the current framework, which the Constitution had not foreseen.
However, many lawmakers viewed the proposal as an attempt to broaden the influence of Sharia law in areas beyond personal affairs. Bamidele Salam, a representative from Osun State, strongly opposed the bill, warning that it could threaten the religious freedom enjoyed by Nigerians. “We must be careful with any constitutional changes that might deepen divisions in the country,” Salam stated, adding that the issues raised are already addressed by existing laws.
Awaji-Inombek Abiante echoed these concerns, urging the bill to be dropped due to the risks it poses.
Despite strong support from several northern lawmakers, including Saidu Abdullah, Abdullah Ado, and Ahmad Satomi, the opposition was overwhelming. When the motion was put to a vote by Deputy Speaker Ben Kalu, the “nays” prevailed, effectively halting the bill.
