Supreme Court slams N40M Fine on foremost lawyer Mike Ozekhome, SAN

Date:

Must Read

Crowds cheer as El-Rufai steps out in Kaduna, video goes viral

Kaduna came alive with excitement as former Governor Nasir...

Coalition: South-East mobilizes for 2027 VP, urges Peter Obi to clarify stance or step aside

As the 2027 Nigerian general election approaches, South-Eastern residents...

REVEALED: Real reasons behind Ganduje’s abrupt “resignation”

Abdullahi Ganduje, the national chairman of Nigeria’s ruling All...

The Supreme Court on Tuesday imposed a fine of N40M on human rights activists and Constitutional lawyer, Chief Mike Ozekhome for filing frivolous motion before the court in respect of Imo Governorship tussle decided since 2019.

In a ruling by Justice Tijani Abubakar, he ordered the Senior Lawyer to personally pay the N40M fine to the four respondents he dragged before the court.

Abubakar held in the ruling that the request was strange, frivolous, baseless, unwarranted, vexatious and irritating.

He further held that the motion was a calculated design to demonize the Supreme Court.

Ozekhome, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN) called to the Nigerian Bar over 42 years ago was fined the huge amount for bringing a motion before the Apex Court seeking to revalidate the suit that removed Emeka Ihedioha as Governor of Imo State in 2019.

Those to be paid are the Action People’s Party, APP, Uche Nnadi, Uche Nwosu and the Independent National Electoral Commission INEC.

In the motion considered to be frivolous by the court, Ozekhome had asked the Court for a consequential order to compel INEC to issue a fresh Certificate of Return to Ihedioha to enable him to spend a four-year tenure as Imo Governor.

His grouse was that the incumbent governor, Senator Hope Uzodimma unlawfully spent the four years which Ihedioha ought to spend.

Among others, Ozekhome in the motion claimed that the All Progressives Congress APC had no candidate in the 2019 Imo Governorship election, hence, Uzodimma ought not to have been made governor on the platform of APC.

However, the apex court dismissed the motion on the ground that it has no jurisdiction to entertain such a motion. (NAN)

spot_imgspot_imgspot_img

Latest News

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here
Captcha verification failed!
CAPTCHA user score failed. Please contact us!
logo-nn-news-small
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.