Why we have refused to comment on 2023 election — INEC

Date:

Must Read

Hayatu Deen joins ADC presidential race as opposition field grows

Renowned economist and banker Mohammed Hayatu Deen has entered...

El Rufai may miss ADC presidential primaries as court prolongs his bail

A Kaduna State High Court has ordered that former...

2027: APC sets dates sales Presidential form ₦100M, Governorship ₦50M

The All Progressives Congress has officially released its timetable...

ADC denies talks with PRP stay focused on protecting democracy and justice for party leadership

The African Democratic Congress (ADC) has dismissed reports that...

The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has revealed why it has not been commenting on the 2023 General Elections, despite the urge to do so.

Prof. Mahmood Yakubu, the chairman of the electoral umpire said this at a meeting with the Resident Electoral Commissioners (RECs) in Abuja, on Tuesday.

The meeting served as the commencement of the formal review of the conduct of the elections.

“Following the conclusion of the election, the time has come for introspection, stocktaking, review and evaluation.

“Since the conclusion of the election, diverse opinions have been expressed by political parties, candidates, observers, analysts and the general public on aspects of the elections that took place in February and March.

“Such diverse opinions should normally be expected, and the commission welcomes all of them insofar as their purpose is to improve the future conduct of elections and to consolidate our democracy,” Yakubu said.

He said the commission has consciously not joined in the commentaries in the immediate aftermath of the election for several reasons.

He said, “First, our preference is to listen more and draw lessons rather than join in the heated and often emotive public discussion on the election. Second, since we plan to conduct our own review of the election, we see no need to pre-empt the process. Third, the commission would not want to be seen as defensive or justificatory in joining the ongoing discussions.

“Finally, and perhaps most importantly, several issues around the election are sub-judice and it is not the intention of the Commission to either undermine or promote the chances of litigants in the various election petition courts beyond what is required of us by the legal process.”

The INEC boss said practically anything coming from the commission could be cited by litigants as either justifying their claims or an indication of bias against them.

spot_imgspot_imgspot_img

Latest News

logo-nn-news-small
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.